Header image

To identify if the Net Promoter Score provides a better understanding to the human experience in the Emergency Department

Tracks
Concurrent Stream 3
Thursday, October 17, 2024
11:50 AM - 12:10 PM
Corinthian Room

Overview

Lesley Fitzpatrick


Speaker

Agenda Item Image
Mrs Lesley Fitzpatrick
Clinical Nurse Consultant
Royal North Shore Hospital

To identify if the Net Promoter Score provides a better understanding to the human experience in the Emergency Department

11:50 AM - 12:10 PM

Abstract

Introduction: Measuring patient’s experience and satisfaction within the Emergency Department (ED) is an integral component in evaluating overall healthcare performance, quality of care and patient health outcomes. Internationally, there are a wide range of patient experience measurement tools for the ED’s that often create a significant number of resources to interpret without direct practice change.
Aim: To identify if the Net Promoter Score (NPS) when combined with the patient experience officer rounding survey provides a better understanding to the human experience in the ED.
Methods: A 12-month retrospective survey audit (January 2023 - December 2023) using the NPS tool (scale of 0 to 10; one question) and the patient experience rounding surveys (12 questions). Patient Experience Officers supported patients to complete the NPS and rounding survey.
Results: A total of 306 adult (n=283) and paediatric (n=23) patients completed the survey, majority were females (n=154; 50.3%) and average age of 61 years (SD 33.2). The overall NPS score was +80, which equates to a ‘world class’ score according to inventors Bain and Company. The NPS calculator results included 251 promoters (score of 9 or 10), 47 passives (score 7 or 8), and 7 detractors (score 6 or below). These results are comparable to the 12-question survey where patients rated highly across all categories: overall care and communication (93%); felt up to date with their plan and journey (98.6%); received assistance within a reasonable timeframe (98.6%) and they were involved in their decisions about care and treatment (97%).
Conclusion: While the NPS identified patient experience levels, it did not provide sufficient detail to determine dimensions of emergency care that individually contributed to a positive experience. In contrast, the patient rounding survey provided immediate feedback to enact actions that addressed both positive and negative responses.

Biography

With 19 years of international nursing experience, Lesley is a Clinical Nurse Consultant in a metropolitan tertiary referral Emergency Department. Renowned as an author and peer reviewer for the Australian Emergency Nursing Journal, she has published 11 research papers covering a spectrum of clinical specialities. Lesley is a co-author of six book chapters, including Cardiovascular Emergencies in the textbook Emergency and Trauma Care for Nurses and Paramedics. As a former Honorary Associate at the University of Technology Sydney, she co-developed the subject comprehensive physical assessment and diagnostic reasoning for a post graduate health subject.
loading