The impact of HIRAID® implementation on the quality of emergency nurse documentation in rural emergency departments: a multi-centre quasi-experimental study
Tracks
Concurrent Stream 2
Wednesday, October 16, 2024 |
4:10 PM - 4:30 PM |
Tuscan Room |
Overview
Belinda Kennedy
Speaker
Ms Belinda Kennedy
PhD Candidate
The University Of Sydney
The impact of HIRAID® implementation on the quality of emergency nurse documentation in rural emergency departments: a multi-centre quasi-experimental study
4:10 PM - 4:30 PMAbstract
Background
Clinical documentation by emergency nurses supports effective communication, improves patient safety and is a professional and legal responsibility, yet documentation is often incomplete, poor quality, or inaccurate.
HIRAID® (History including Infection risk, Red Flags, Assessment, Interventions, Diagnostics, communication and reassessment) is a validated framework that supports nurses in assessment and management of patients in the emergency department. As part of a larger evaluation, HIRAID® was implemented in a large rural health district using an implementation strategy informed by behaviour change theory.
This study aimed to evaluate the quality of initial nursing documentation in the rural context pre-post implementation of the HIRAID® emergency nursing framework.
Methods
A quasi-experimental, pre-post study design was conducted across ten emergency departments in rural NSW during 2020/21. A previously validated modified D-catch instrument was used to evaluate emergency nurses’ initial documentation for a three-month period before and repeated six months after implementation. The instrument assessed the quality and quantity of documentation on a four-point ordinal scale. Following power calculations, records meeting inclusion were randomised for review.
Results
In 222 records (110 pre/112 post) there was significant improvement in initial ED nursing documentation. Post-implementation there was a significant increase in the mean (SD) scores for the quantity of documentation elements for all areas, in particular, structure (1.6(0.9) -3.3(1.1), p<0.0001), history (1.9(1.1) - 3(1.1), p<0.001) and red flags (1.5(0.9) – 2.3(1.3), p<0.0001). The quality of documentation also significantly improved, with the greatest improvement in areas of history (1.5(0.6) – 2.3(0.8), p<0.001) and assessment (1.6(0.7) – 2.3(0.9), p<0.001).
Conclusion
Emergency nursing initial documentation six-months after the implementation of the HIRAID® demonstrated significant improvement across all areas following a behaviour change informed strategy for practice change. Improved documentation is key to informing and evaluating ongoing care, supporting communication and continuity of care, and is essential to patient safety.
Clinical documentation by emergency nurses supports effective communication, improves patient safety and is a professional and legal responsibility, yet documentation is often incomplete, poor quality, or inaccurate.
HIRAID® (History including Infection risk, Red Flags, Assessment, Interventions, Diagnostics, communication and reassessment) is a validated framework that supports nurses in assessment and management of patients in the emergency department. As part of a larger evaluation, HIRAID® was implemented in a large rural health district using an implementation strategy informed by behaviour change theory.
This study aimed to evaluate the quality of initial nursing documentation in the rural context pre-post implementation of the HIRAID® emergency nursing framework.
Methods
A quasi-experimental, pre-post study design was conducted across ten emergency departments in rural NSW during 2020/21. A previously validated modified D-catch instrument was used to evaluate emergency nurses’ initial documentation for a three-month period before and repeated six months after implementation. The instrument assessed the quality and quantity of documentation on a four-point ordinal scale. Following power calculations, records meeting inclusion were randomised for review.
Results
In 222 records (110 pre/112 post) there was significant improvement in initial ED nursing documentation. Post-implementation there was a significant increase in the mean (SD) scores for the quantity of documentation elements for all areas, in particular, structure (1.6(0.9) -3.3(1.1), p<0.0001), history (1.9(1.1) - 3(1.1), p<0.001) and red flags (1.5(0.9) – 2.3(1.3), p<0.0001). The quality of documentation also significantly improved, with the greatest improvement in areas of history (1.5(0.6) – 2.3(0.8), p<0.001) and assessment (1.6(0.7) – 2.3(0.9), p<0.001).
Conclusion
Emergency nursing initial documentation six-months after the implementation of the HIRAID® demonstrated significant improvement across all areas following a behaviour change informed strategy for practice change. Improved documentation is key to informing and evaluating ongoing care, supporting communication and continuity of care, and is essential to patient safety.
Biography
Belinda has been nursing for over 25 years, most of that time in emergency nursing in Sydney. Belinda currently completing her PhD evaluating implementation of HIRAID in Southern NSW and also assists to manage the HIRAID emergency research program in NSW and Victoria.
